1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 271 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | GT 40 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 46 L |
