1967 Ford Mustang vs. 1955 Singer Hunter
To start off, 1967 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 19 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 1955 Singer Hunter | |
Make | Ford | Singer |
Model | Mustang | Hunter |
Year Released | 1967 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1146 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2180 mm |