1967 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1967 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Mustang | Elan |
Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |