1967 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 170 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Mustang | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Mustang | Murena |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4733 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 116 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2440 mm |
