1967 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (63 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 70 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 19 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |