1967 Ford Mustang vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 265 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |