1967 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Honda Civic

To start off, 1996 Honda Civic is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1996 Honda Civic. (90 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 200 kg more than 1996 Honda Civic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Ford Mustang 1996 Honda Civic
Make Ford Honda
Model Mustang Civic
Year Released 1967 1996
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4733 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 217 HP 90 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1165 kg 965 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2630 mm