1967 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Tata Estate
To start off, 2000 Tata Estate is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP) has 150 more horse power than 2000 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Estate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata Estate weights approximately 475 kg more than 1967 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 2000 Tata Estate | |
Make | Ford | Tata |
Model | Mustang | Estate |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |