1967 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 45 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 6 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |