1967 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (263 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1967 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 164 kg more than 1967 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Ford Mustang 2009 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 3
Year Released 1967 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4733 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 217 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1165 kg 1329 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 55 L