1967 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Captiva. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 680 kg more than 1967 Ford Mustang.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Mustang | Captiva |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |