1967 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,700 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (453 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1967 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1554 kg more than 1967 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Mustang | Phantom |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 6700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 453 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 2719 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1566 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |