1967 Ford Zephyr vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Zephyr (81 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 395 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Ford Zephyr (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: