1967 Ford Zephyr vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Zephyr (81 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 360 kg more than 1967 Ford Zephyr.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford Zephyr. (153 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Zephyr | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Zephyr | Celica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2440 mm |