1967 Ford Zephyr vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1967 Ford Zephyr. (81 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Zephyr.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford Zephyr. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Zephyr | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Zephyr | TT |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2469 mm |
