1967 Ford Zephyr vs. 2012 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 05-Sep (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1967 Ford Zephyr. (81 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Zephyr.
Because 1967 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 05-Sep (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford Zephyr. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Zephyr | 2012 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Zephyr | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2837 mm |