1967 Holden HR vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1967 Holden HR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Holden HR weights approximately 150 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Holden HR | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Holden | Sunbeam |
Model | HR | Tiger |
Year Released | 1967 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3048 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2190 mm |