1967 Holden HR vs. 1972 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 1972 Jaguar XJ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Jaguar XJ (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 590 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Holden HR | 1972 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | HR | XJ |
Year Released | 1967 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3048 cc | 5344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |