1967 Holden HR vs. 1978 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1978 Toyota Tercel is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Holden HR weights approximately 470 kg more than 1978 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1967 Holden HR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Holden HR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1967 Holden HR has automatic transmission and 1978 Toyota Tercel has manual transmission. 1978 Toyota Tercel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 Holden HR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Holden HR | 1978 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HR | Tercel |
Year Released | 1967 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3048 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |