1967 Holden HR vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Holden HR weights approximately 108 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Holden HR (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Holden HR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Holden HR | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HR | Celica |
Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3048 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |