1967 Holden HR vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Holden HR weights approximately 190 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1967 Holden HR has automatic transmission and 1992 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 Holden HR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Holden HR | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | HR | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 3048 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
