1967 Holden HR vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (231 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 518 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (363 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Holden HR | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | HR | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3048 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 231 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1808 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |
