1967 Holden HR vs. 2004 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (212 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 395 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Holden HR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Subaru Outback (285 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm). This means 2004 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.

Compare all specifications: