1967 Holden HR vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Holden HR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Holden HR | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | HR | Nessie |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2790 mm |