1967 Holden HR vs. 2005 Peugeot 607

To start off, 2005 Peugeot 607 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Peugeot 607 (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Peugeot 607 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Holden HR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Holden HR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 607, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Peugeot 607 (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2005 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.

Compare all specifications: