1967 Holden HR vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Holden HR | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | HR | XJ |
Year Released | 1967 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3048 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3170 mm |