1967 Holden HR vs. 2010 Audi Q5
To start off, 2010 Audi Q5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi Q5 (138 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR.
Because 2010 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Holden HR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi Q5 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2010 Audi Q5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Holden HR | 2010 Audi Q5 | |
| Make | Holden | Audi |
| Model | HR | Q5 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3048 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1654 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2807 mm |
