1967 Holden HR vs. 2010 BMW M5

To start off, 2010 BMW M5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2010 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M5 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 392 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M5 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW M5 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2010 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR. 1967 Holden HR has automatic transmission and 2010 BMW M5 has manual transmission. 2010 BMW M5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 Holden HR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: