1967 Humber Sceptre vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1967 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1967 Humber Sceptre.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Humber Sceptre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Humber Sceptre. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Humber Sceptre | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Humber | Jeep |
| Model | Sceptre | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1725 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
