1967 Innocenti C vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1969 Lotus Elan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Innocenti C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Innocenti C would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (118 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1967 Innocenti C. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1967 Innocenti C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Lotus Elan weights approximately 119 kg more than 1967 Innocenti C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Innocenti C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Lotus Elan (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Innocenti C. (83 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Innocenti C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Innocenti C | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Innocenti | Lotus |
| Model | C | Elan |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 889 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 59 L |
