1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 7,291 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (518 HP) has 437 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 755 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (766 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 604 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Isuzu Bellel | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Bellel | SL |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7291 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 518 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 766 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |
