1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (294 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 320 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Isuzu Bellel | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | Bellel | XJ |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4195 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 294 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 411 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 85 L |