1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 604 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Isuzu Bellel | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Bellel | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3965 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1899 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 78 L |
