1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Isuzu Bellel | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Isuzu | Land Rover |
Model | Bellel | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4396 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 100 L |