1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (144 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 522 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Isuzu Bellel | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Bellel | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2427 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 144 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1817 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |
