1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 72 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (184 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Isuzu Bellel | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Bellel | 3 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 144 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1223 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |
