1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1967 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Micra (87 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Micra weights approximately 147 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Isuzu Bellel (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Micra. (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1967 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Isuzu Bellel | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
| Model | Bellel | Micra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1386 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 87 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 46 L |
