1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1967 Jaguar 240 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | 240 | R 360 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |