1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1996 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Jaguar 240 | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Jaguar | Honda |
| Model | 240 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.8 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2620 mm |
