1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 1999 Mazda Activehicle
To start off, 1999 Mazda Activehicle is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Activehicle weights approximately 50 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Activehicle. (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Activehicle.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 1999 Mazda Activehicle | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | 240 | Activehicle |
Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |