1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 328 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (460 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 240 | SL |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 460 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |