1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (210 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 391 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (334 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | 240 | Frontier |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1831 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 73 L |