1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 weights approximately 399 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 (460 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 240 | E500 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 460 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1919 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |