1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 208 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 312 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis (359 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
Model | 240 | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1832 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |