1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2005 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 307 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Peugeot 307. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2005 Peugeot 307. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2005 Peugeot 307. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 307, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Peugeot 307 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (203 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Peugeot 307 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Jaguar 240 | 2005 Peugeot 307 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
| Model | 240 | 307 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2482 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |
