1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2005 Toyota Highlander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Highlander (230 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 110 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (328 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | 240 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 73 L |