1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E (221 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 175 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 240 | E |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |