1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 265 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | 240 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 415 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 87 L |