1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (237 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2008 Toyota Tundra.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | 240 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |