1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2009 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Stilo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Stilo. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2009 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Stilo (256 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (203 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2009 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Jaguar | Fiat |
Model | 240 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 256 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 90.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 58 L |